بهبود مدیریت

بهبود مدیریت

هوشمندسازی معادن به مثابه گذار اجتماعی- فنی؛ چالش های گذار و راهکارهای سیاستی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری مدیریت فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران (دانشکدگان فارابی)
3 دانشیار، پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی چالش ها و موانع اجتماعی-فنی گذار به هوشمندسازی معادن در ایران و ارائه راهکارهای سیاستی برای مواجهه با این چالش ها انجام شده است. این پژوهش با استفاده از رویکرد چشم انداز چندسطحی (MLP)، یک چارچوب نظری برای تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در گذار اجتماعی-فنی هوشمندسازی معادن توسعه داده است. سپس، با بهره گیری از نظرات خبرگان در گروه های کانونی و روش تحلیل مضمون، چالش های این گذار در سه سطح فرانما، رژیم اجتماعی-فنی و کنام شناسایی و راهکارهای سیاستی متناسب برای هر سطح ارائه شده است. در سطح فرانما، دو چالش اصلی نبود الزامات اقتصادی و بهره وری و نبود الزامات زیست محیطی و انسانی شناسایی شد که برای مقابله با آنها، برنامه هایی مانند اعطای تسهیلات هدفمند و یارانه انرژی پیشنهاد گردید. در سطح رژیم اجتماعی-فنی، چالش های سیاستی و قانونی، کاستی در حمایت مدیریت از تغییر، چالش های فرهنگی-اجتماعی و فناورانه و زیرساختی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و دوازده راهکار از جمله ایجاد پنجره واحد صدور مجوزهای فناورانه، توسعه مرکز تحول دیجیتال، برنامه های آموزش مدیران و کارکنان، و حمایت از پروژه های آزمایشی در زمینه هوشمندسازی ارائه شد. در سطح کنام، زیست بوم نوآوری ضعیف و دشواری نوآوری در بخش معدن شناسایی و راهکارهایی مانند توسعه نهادی و زیرساختی (از طریق ایجاد مراکز نوآوری و کنسرسیوم های فناورانه) و تسهیل همکاری و انتقال دانش (با حمایت از پروژه های مشترک دانشگاه و صنعت) پیشنهاد شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Smart Mining as a Socio-Technical Transition: Transition Challenges and Policy Solutions

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Nesari 1
Mostafa Safdari Ranjbar 2
Kiarash Fartash 3
1 PhD in Technology Management, Department of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor at the Department of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran (College of Farabi)
3 Associate Professor, Institute for Fundamental Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

While the mining industry significantly contributes to countries' economic development, it also adversely affects human health and the environment. However, digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, robotics, and drones have demonstrated considerable potential to mitigate these challenges through mine digitalization. This study aims to identify the socio-technical challenges and obstacles in transitioning to digitalized mines in Iran and to propose policy solutions to address these challenges. Using the Multi-Level Perspective framework, this research develops a theoretical model to analyze factors influencing the socio-technical transition toward mine digitalization. Through expert opinions in focus groups and thematic analysis, transition challenges were identified at three levels—landscape, socio-technical regime, and niche—with corresponding policy solutions proposed for each level. At the landscape level, two main challenges were identified: the lack of economic and productivity imperatives and the absence of environmental and human requirements. To address these, programs such as targeted financial facilities and energy subsidies were proposed. At the socio-technical regime level, challenges included policy and legal barriers, insufficient management support for change, socio-cultural challenges, and technological and infrastructural shortcomings. Twelve solutions were proposed, such as establishing a single window for technology licensing, developing a digital transformation center, implementing training programs for managers and staff, and supporting pilot projects in digitalization. At the niche level, a weak innovation ecosystem and difficulties in the mining sector innovation were identified. Solutions included institutional and infrastructural development (through innovation centers and technology consortia) and facilitating collaboration and knowledge transfer (by supporting university-industry joint projects).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Socio-technical transition
Smart mine
Multi-level perspective
Digital transformation
Digitalization
A Look at the Status of Major Sectors of Iran's Economy: First Report: The Mining Sector. 1401, Tehran: Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines, and Agriculture. [In Persian]
Attride-Stirling. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 385-405.
Barnewold, L., & G. Lottermoser, B. (2020). Identification of digital technologies and digitalisation trends in the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30, 747-757.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Cameron, R., & Geels, F. (2019). Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 221-240.
Canitez, F. (2019). Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A sociotechnical transition perspective. Technological Forecating and Social Change, 141, 319-329.
Challenges and Solutions for Addressing Technological Needs in Mines and Mineral Industries (1): Analysis of the State of Technology Development in Iran's Mines and Mineral Industries, (1401), Office of Energy, Industry, and Mining Studies (Mining and Mineral Industries Group), Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
Choi, Y. (2023). Recent Advances in Smart Mining Technology. Appl. Sci, 13.
Comparative Analysis of the Mining Economy in Chile, Canada, and Iran. Vice Presidency for Infrastructure and Production Research, 1395, Office of Energy, Industry, and Mining Studies, Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
El Bilali, H. (2019). The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review. Agriculture, 9(74).
Farzami, H., Salehi, T., Soleimani, M., Ramezani, M., Keshtkar Bagheri, A. (1401). Challenges and Solutions for Addressing Technological Needs in Mines and Mineral Industries (1): Analysis of the State of Technology Development in Iran's Mines and Mineral Industries. Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
Fuenfschiling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43, 772-791.
Gabryk, W., & Naidoo, R. (2024). Sociotechnical perspectives of digital technologies in sustainable mining. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 28.
Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33, 897-920.
Geels, F. (2005). Process and patterns in transitions and system innovation: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72, 681-696.
Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24-40.
Geels, F. (2018). Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016). Energy Research and Social Science, 46, 86-102.
Geels, F. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 1-15.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological Transition as Evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27, 363-397.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in sociotechnical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445-476.
Ghorbani, Y., Zhang, S. E., Nwaila, G. T., Bourdeau, J. E., Safari, M., Hoseinie, H., . . . Ruuska, J. (2023). Dry laboratories – Mapping the required instrumentation and infrastructure for online monitoring, analysis, and characterization in the mineral industry. Minerals Engineering, 191.
Ghosh, B., & Schot, J. (2019). Towards a novel regime change framework: Studying mobility transitions in public transport regimes in an Indian megacity. Energy Research and Social Science, 51, 82-95.
IMIDRO's Programs in Line with the Digital Transformation and Smartening of Mines and Mineral Industries in Iran, 1402, Tehran: IMIDRO. [In Persian]
Kalenov, O., & Kukushkin, S. (2021). Digital Transformation of Mining Enterprises. SDEMR-2021. E3S Web of Conferences.
Kim, Y., Lee, J., & Ahn, J. (2019). Innovation towards sustainable technologies: A socio-technical perspective on accelerating transition to aviation biofuel. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 317-329.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (n.d.). Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE Publication.
Lazarenko, Y., Garafonova, O., Marhasova, V., & Tkalenko, N. (2021). Digital Transformation in the Mining Sector: Exploring Global Technology Trends and Managerial Issues. VIth International Innovative Mining Symposium. E3S Web of Conferences.
Levidow, L., & Upham, P. (2017). Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory: Gasifiers as a niche innovation reinforcing the energy-from-waste (EfW) regime. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 1-13.
Liu, X., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Qu, F., Shao, A., Zhao, L., . . . He, J. (2024). Research progress and prospects of intelligent technology in underground mining of hard rock mines. Green and Smart Mining Engineering, 12-26.
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook.
Moezzi Nasab, R., & Salmani, A. (2024). Sustainable Development of Mining by Utilizing Innovative Global Methods to Reduce Mining Hazards. Journal of Environment and Sustainable Mining, 2(1), 22-29.
Moradi, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2018). A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: What are the future transition pathways? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 126, 231-243.
Raven, R., Van Den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 57-74.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15-31.
Sheikhzadeh, M., Baniasad, R. (2020). Thematic Analysis: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Tehran: Logos Publications. [In Persian]
Shimaponda-Nawa, M., & Nwaila, G. T. (2024). Integrated and intelligent remote operation centres (I2ROCs): Assessing the human–machine requirements for 21st century mining operations. Minerals Engineering.
Sovacool, B., & Hess, D. (2O17). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 703-750.
The Digital Mine :A review of Australia’s mining innovation ecosyste, 2022, Minerals Council of Australia
Van Weilie, M., Cherunya, P., Truffer, B., & Murphy, J. (2018). Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: The case of Nairobi's splintered sanitation regime. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Weber, K., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 41, 1037-1047.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Zhironkin, S., & Ezdina, N. (2023a). Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to Mining 5.0 Innovative Technologies. Appl. Sci, 13.
Zhironkina, O., & Zhironkin, S. (2023b). Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review. Energies, 16

فایل‌های تکمیلی/اضافی

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 دی 1404