بهبود مدیریت

بهبود مدیریت

بررسی رابطه فشارهای اقتصادی و به‌کارگیری استراتژی‌های دوسوتوان در مواجهه با چالش‌های شناختی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان حوزه زیست‌فناوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری تخصصی مدیریت دولتی گرایش رفتار سازمانی، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه ارزیابی سیاست‌ها و پایش علم، فناوری و نوآوری، مؤسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش کاربردی، بررسی نقش دوسوتوانی در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان حوزه زیست‌فناوری در مواجهه استراتژیک پارادوکس‌ها و چالش‌های شناختی سازمانی با رویکرد پژوهش‌های همبستگی است. برای توزیع پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته از روش نمونه‌گیری‌ هدفمند و مبتنی بر طیف لیکرت و بررسی بدون واسطه در گردآوری داده‌های پژوهش استفاده شده است. نمونه آماری شامل 216 شرکت دانش‌بنیان در حوزه زیست‌فناوری کشور است که از میان عوامل محیطی متعدد به بررسی مؤلفه‌ اقتصادی در تقسیم‌بندی چالش‌ها و پارادوکس‌های موجود، نقطه نظرات ایشان در سال 1402 مورد بررسی و پژوهش قرار گرفت. بر همین اساس، رابطه به‌دست آمده فشارهای اقتصادی و به‌کارگیری استراتژی‌های دوسوتوان در مواجهه با پارادوکس‌ها و چالش‌های شناختی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان حوزه زیست‌فناوری و نتایج الگوریتم تحلیل داده‌ها بر پایه اعتباریابی محتوایی، گواه بر روایی ابزار سنجش و ضریب حدود 92 درصد کرونباخ (۰٫۹α ≥ )، پایایی مقیاس لیکرت، همبستگی مثبت و معناداری پارادایم‌های مذکور را نشان می‌دهد. بنابراین، عوامل اثرگذار محیطی از منظر رواداری مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی با اتکاء بر مفاهیم دوسوتوان در کاهش یا افزایش چالش‌ها در شناخت بهتر و تقلیل سطح دوگانگی در رفع مسائل و پیچیدگی‌های سازمانی نقش بسزایی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the relationship between economic pressures and the use of ambidexterity strategies in facing the cognitive challenges of biotechnology knowledge enterprises

نویسندگان English

Hesam Khazraei Hazehg Fekr 1
Ghasem Azadi 2
1 Ph.D. in public administration, majoring in organizational behavior, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Prof. Policy evaluation and Monitoring of Science, Technology, and Innovation Department, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of this applied research is to investigate the role of ambivalence in biotechnology knowledge enterprises in the strategic confrontation of paradoxes and organizational cognitive challenges with the approach of correlational research. For the distribution of the questionnaire made by the researcher, a purposeful sampling method based on the Likert scale and unmediated survey was used in the collection of research data. The statistical population includes 216 knowledge enterprise active in the biotechnology field, among the many environmental factors, the economic component in the division of existing challenges and paradoxes, their points of view were investigated and researched in 2023. Based on this, the obtained relationship between economic pressures and the use of two-way strategies in facing the paradoxes and cognitive challenges of complex environmental organizations and the results of the data analysis algorithm based on content validation, prove the validity of the measurement tool and the Cronbach's coefficient of about 92% (α ≥ 0.9), the reliability of the Likert scale shows the positive and significant correlation of the mentioned paradigms. Therefore, environmental influencing factors from the point of view of tolerance of economic components by relying on ambidextrous concepts play a significant role in reducing or increasing challenges in better understanding and reducing the level of duality in solving organizational problems and complexities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

"Ambidextrity"
"Economic pressures"
" Organizational cognitive challenges"
" Paradoxes"
"Organizational Challenges"
"Biotechnology knowledge enterprises"
  1. آزادی احمدآبادی، قاسم. (1403). همراستایی بروندادهای علمی حوزه زیست‌فناوری ‌ایران با اهداف توسعه پایدار سازمان ملل متحد. مطالعات کارآفرینی و توسعه پایدار کشاورزی، 11(3)، 127-146. doi: 10.22069/jead.2024.22358.1821

    احمدیان، ع.، حاجی حسینی، ح.، برادران، م ص. (1391). مقدمه‌ای برکارآفرینی فناورانه در زیست‌فناوری. فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی، 10 (2) 5-18.

    خردمندنیا س. (1394). زیست‌فناوری از منظر سیاست‌ها، قوانین و مقررات. مرکز پژوهش‌های شورای اسلامی.

    خضرایی حاذق فکر، حسام. (1403). نگاشت مغزی همدلی شناختی در نورولیدرشیپ با استفاده از الکتروانسفالوگرافی کمی (qEEG)، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران. 10.22059/JAPR.2023.353564.644501 doi: https://japr.ut.ac.ir/article_95259.html

     

    Al-Assadi, Adel Kased.M. & Mhaibes, Hussam Ali. (2024). "The Role of Managers' Cognitive Styles in Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity". Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences –JEAS. P-ISSN: 2518-5764, E-ISSN: 2227-703X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33095/q80wsx53

    Akgün, Ali E., Halit Keskin, John C. Byrne, and Selim Aren. "Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance." Technovation 27, no. 9 (2007): 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.03.001

    Ancona, Deborah Gladstein, and David Caldwell. "Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams." The Journal of High Technology Management Research 1, no. 2 (1990): 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(90)90001-K

    Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku. "Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation." Journal of marketing 69, no. 4 (2005): 61-83. https://doi. org/10. 1509/jmkg. 2005. 69. 4. 61

    Barney, Jay. "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage." Journal of management 17, no. 1 (1991): 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206391017001

    Baum, J. A. C., Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2014). Does evidence of network effects on firm performance in pooled cross-section support prescriptions for network strategy? Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 652–667. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.2133

    Benner, Mary J., and Michael L. Tushman. "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited." Academy of management review 28, no. 2 (2003): 238-256. https://doi. org/10. 2307/30040711

    Bhatt, Prachi, Priyanka Jaiswal, Bishakha Majumdar, and Subir Verma. Riding the new tides: Navigating the future through effective people management. Emerald Publishing, 2017. ISBN: 9781786354174.

    Birkinshaw, Julian, and Christina B. Gibson. "Building an ambidextrous organisation." Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper 003 (2004).

    Boyatzis, Richard E., Angela M. Passarelli, Katherine Koenig, Mark Lowe, Blessy Mathew, James K. Stoller, and Michael Phillips. "Examination of the neural substrates activated in memories of experiences with resonant and dissonant leaders." The Leadership Quarterly 23, no. 2 (2012): 259-272.

    Cillo, Paola, Luigi M. De Luca, and Gabriele Troilo. "Market information approaches, product innovativeness, and firm performance: An empirical study in the fashion industry." Research Policy 39, no. 9 (2010): 1242-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.06.004

    Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly 35, no. 1 (1990): 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

    David, Fred R., and Forest R. David. Strategic management: concepts and cases: A competitive advantage approach. Pearson, 2017.

    Day, George S. "Closing the marketing capabilities gap." Journal of marketing 75, no. 4 (2011): 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.183

    Doblinger, Claudia, William Wales, and Alexander Zimmermann. "Stemming the downturn: How ambidexterity and public policy influence firm performance stability during economic crises." European Management Journal 40, no. 2 (2022): 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.06.002.

    Døjbak Håkonsson, Dorthe, Jacob Kjær Eskildsen, Linda Argote, Dan Mønster, Richard M. Burton, and Børge Obel. "Exploration versus exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions." Strategic Management Journal 37, no. 6 (2016): 985-1001. https://doi. org/10. 1002/smj. 2380

    Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Behnam N. Tabrizi. "Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry." Administrative science quarterly (1995): 84-110. https://doi. org/10. 2307/2393701

    Fernández‐Pérez de la Lastra, Susana, and Gonzalo Sánchez‐Gardey. "Organizational ambidexterity: A reconceptualization and research agenda for the VUCA international context." Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 32, no. 2 (2024): e12565. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12565

    Ganzaroli, Andrea, Ivan De Noni, Luigi Orsi, and Fiorenza Belussi. "The combined effect of technological relatedness and knowledge utilization on explorative and exploitative invention performance post-M & A." European Journal of Innovation Management 19, no. 2 (2016): 167-188. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-08-2014-0092

    Gibson, Cristina B., and Julian Birkinshaw. "The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity." Academy of management Journal 47, no. 2 (2004): 209-226. https://doi. org/10. 2307/20159573

    Gulati, Ranjay, Phanish Puranam, and Michael Tushman. "Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts." Strategic management journal 33, no. 6 (2012): 571-586. https://www. jstor. org/stable/41524882

    Guo, Huiling, Hangjun Xu, Chuanyi Tang, Yuping Liu-Thompkins, Zhaoyang Guo, and Baobao Dong. "Comparing the impact of different marketing capabilities: Empirical evidence from B2B firms in China." Journal of Business Research 93 (2018): 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2318880

    Gupta, Anil K., Ken G. Smith, and Christina E. Shalley. "The interplay between exploration and exploitation." Academy of management journal 49, no. 4 (2006): 693-706. https://doi. org/10. 5465/amj. 2006. 22083026

    Hawkins, David R. Power vs. force. Hay House, Inc, 2014.

    Hill, Susan A., and Julian Birkinshaw. "Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units." Journal of management 40, no. 7 (2014): 1899-1931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206312445925

    Hoonsopon, Danupol, and Guntalee Ruenrom. "The impact of organizational capabilities on the development of radical and incremental product innovation and product innovation performance." Journal of Managerial Issues (2012): 250-276. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43488811

    Hoskisson, Robert E., Lorraine Eden, Chung Ming Lau, and Mike Wright. "Strategy in emerging economies." Academy of management journal 43, no. 3 (2000): 249-267. DOI: 10. 2307/1556394. https://www. jstor. org/stable/1556394

    http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306922

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.037

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.003.

    ISBN: 9781422172810. https://www. leadershipnow. com/leadershop/9781422172810. html

    Jansen, Justin JP, Frans AJ Van den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda. "Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents." Schmalenbach Business Review 57 (2005): 351-363. DOI:10.1007/BF03396721. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03396721

    Jansen, Justin JP, Gerard George, Frans AJ Van den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda. "Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership." Journal of Management Studies 45, no. 5 (2008): 982-1007. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775. x. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x

    Kassotaki, Olga. "Review of organizational ambidexterity research." Sage Open 12, no. 1 (2022): 21582440221082127. https://doi. org/10. 1177/215824402210821

    Kostova, Tatiana, and Srilata Zaheer. "Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise." Academy of Management review 24, no. 1 (1999): 64-81. https://doi. org/10. 2307/259037

    Liaqat, Muhammad Mohsen. "Compliance pressure and cognitive inconsistencies in social entrepreneurs" International Conference on Business & Commerce, Hailey College of Commerce, Lahore, no. 1 (2023): 2023/11. https://www.hcc.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ICBC-Proceedings.pdf

    March, James G. "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning." Organization science 2, no. 1 (1991): 71-87. http://www. jstor. org/stable/2634940

    McGrath, Rita Gunther. The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x

    Mir, Reyazul Rouf, Mathew Reynolds, Francisco Pinto, Mohd Anwar Khan, and Mohd Ashraf Bhat. "High-throughput phenotyping for crop improvement in the genomics era." Plant Science 282 (2019): 60-72. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. plantsci. 2019. 01. 007

    Moorman, Christine, and George S. Day. "Organizing for marketing excellence." Journal of Marketing 80, no. 6 (2016): 6-35. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0423

    O’reilly Iii, Charles A., and Michael L. Tushman. "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma." Research in organizational behavior 28 (2008): 185-206. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. riob. 2008. 06. 002

    Page, S. (2017). The book neuroLeadership: How the world's best leaders use psychology to win, Translated into Persian by: Hesam Khazraei Hazehg Fekr (PhD), 2023. Iran, Tehran, Mehraban Publications.https://www.amazon.com/Neuroleadership-Worlds-Best-Leaders-Psychology/dp/0994390254https://www.iranketab.ir/book/103503-neuroleadership (In Persian).

    Probst, Gilbert, and Sebastian Raisch. "Organizational crisis: The logic of failure." Academy of Management Perspectives 19, no. 1 (2005): 90-105. https://doi. org/10. 5465/ame. 2005. 15841958

    Probst, Gilbert, Sebastian Raisch, and Michael L. Tushman. "Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders." Organizational Dynamics 40, no. 4 (2011): 326-334. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. orgdyn. 2011. 07. 010

    1. Agarwal, J.B. Barney, N.J. Foss, P.G. Klein. (2009). Heterogeneous resources and the financial crisis: Implications of strategic management theory Strategic Organization, 7 (4), pp. 467-484. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1476127009346790.

    Raisch, Sebastian, Julian Birkinshaw, Gilbert Probst, and Michael L. Tushman. "Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance." Organization science 20, no. 4 (2009): 685-695. https://doi. org/10. 1287/orsc. 1090. 0428

    Reeves, Martin, and Knut Haanaes. Your strategy needs a strategy: How to choose and execute the right approach. Harvard Business Review Press, 2015.

    Rubera, Gaia, and Ahmet H. Kirca. "Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration." Journal of marketing 76, no. 3 (2012): 130-147. https://doi. org/10. 1509/jm. 10. 0494

    Saeed, Saadat, Shumaila Yousafzai, Angela Paladino, and Luigi M. De Luca. "Inside-out and outside-in orientations: A meta-analysis of orientation's effects on innovation and firm performance." Industrial marketing management 47 (2015): 121-133.

    Sheremata, Willow A. "Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure." Academy of management review 25, no. 2 (2000): 389-408. https://doi.org/10.2307/259020

    Simsek, Zeki, Ciaran Heavey, John F. Veiga, and David Souder. "A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes." Journal of management studies 46, no. 5 (2009): 864-894. https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1467-6486. 2009. 00841. x

    Smith, Wendy K., and Michael L. Tushman. "Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams." Organization science 16, no. 5 (2005): 522-536. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134

    Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management." Strategic management journal 18, no. 7 (1997): 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Toyama, Ryoko, and Philippe Byosière. "A theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic processo of creating knowledge." DIERKES, M.; BERTHOIN ANTAL, A.; CHILD, J (2001). https://global.oup.com/academic/product/handbook-of-organizational-learning-and-knowledge-9780198295822?cc=us&lang=en&

    Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12034

    Wang, Catherine L., and Mohammed Rafiq. "Ambidextrous organizational culture, Contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and C hinese high‐tech Firms." British Journal of management 25, no. 1 (2014): 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x

    Wang, Catherine L., and Mohammed Rafiq. "Ambidextrous organizational culture, Contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and C hinese high‐tech Firms." British Journal of management 25, no. 1 (2014): 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x

    Yalcinkaya, Goksel, Roger J. Calantone, and David A. Griffith. "An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation and market performance." Journal of International Marketing 15, no. 4 (2007): 63-93. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1509/jimk.15.4.63

    Yunita, Tyna, Sasmoko Sasmoko, Agustinus Bandur, and Firdaus Alamsjah. "Organizational ambidexterity: The role of technological capacity and dynamic capabilities in the face of environmental dynamism." Heliyon 9, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14817

    Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883902608000529?via%3Dihub

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 اسفند 1403