Document Type : Research Article (Original Article)
Authors
1
Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
2
Professor, Faculty of Management and Industrial Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3
PhD candidate of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to draw on the model of caching up in aviation industry with emphasis on passenger aircraft by using the experiences of late comer countries and considering the capabilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, to present pattern and identify the strategies and measures needed in this direction. This is done by comparative exploration in aviation industry of countries such as China, Japan, Canada and Brazil, where the timeframe of their aviation development plans is nearer. The method of present study is qualitative and its strategy is multiple case study. In this research we are looking for methods of caching up the technology of the late comer in aviation industry. At first, historical of the aviation industry has been studied with a focus on the last 24 years. In this review, high citation paper even if related to older times, have been considered. we selected the countries such as Canada, Brazil, China and Japan, that are the owner of company such as Bombardier, Embraer in Canada and Brazil respectively, and aircraft models C919 and ARJ21 in China and the MRJ21 in Japan. By reviewing their capabilities actions of the China, Japan, Canada and Brazil obtained and compared with IRAN’S capabilities, Iran’s technology gap has been identified, and based on this, in catching up of technology based on three important factors: i) Indigenous R&D; ii) Export oriented and iii) Capability and capacity making, and the alignment pattern by emphasizing on part manufacturing and industrial offset with emphasizing on privatization and project implementation in six stages, are issued.
After reviewing their historical development, the capability actions of the selected countries are obtained and compared with IRAN’S capabilities, and coming in the table 3 to 7. Iran’s technology gap has been identified in this area, and on this basis strategic implications in this area have been identified and present a pattern.
Keywords
)