آذر، عادل، میرفخرالدینی، سیدحیدر و علی اصغر انواری رستمی (1387). بررسی مقایسه ای تحلیل داده ها در شش سیگما، با کمک ابزارهای آماری و فنون تصمیمگیری چند شاخصه، مجله مدرس علوم انسانی، دورة 12 شمارة 4 :1 -36.
الیاسی، مهدی؛ امیری، مقصود؛ محمدی، مهدی(1392). تأثیر قابلیت سازی بنگاهها توسط سازماهای میانجی بر توسعه همکاری های فناورانه )مورد مطالعه: صنایع هوایی (،فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، شماره 3، صفحات 73-95.
بیگی، وحید؛ علیمحمدی، عباس(1394). شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار در ناکامی شبکه همکاریهای علمی و نوآوری: آسیبشناسی دفاتر نهاد میانجی، فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری،
دوره 3، شماره 3 ، صفحه 81-104.
خصاف مفرد، حسین؛ دانائی فرد، حسن (1394).کارویژه های مطلوب واسطه های نوآوری در ارتقاء ظرفیت نوآورانه شرکتهای دانش بنیان، فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، سال هفتم، شماره 2، صفحه 23-1.
سهرابی، بابک؛ اعظمی، امیر؛ یزدانی، حمیدرضا(1390). آسیب شناسی پژوهشهای انجام شده در زمینه مدیریت اسلامی با رویکرد فراترکیب. فصلنامه چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی.
موسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور(1401). قوانین، آیین نامهها، دستورالعمل ها و ضوابط اجرایی حوزه فناوری و نوآوری.
مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی(1402). ارائه مدل اولیه دسته بندی پارک های علم و فناوری کشور مبتنی بر شاخص های ارزیابی و عملکرد، دفتر مطالعات انرژی، صنعت و معدن،.
نوروزی، عفت؛ طباطبائیان، سید حبیب ا...؛ قاضی نوری، سید سروش(1395). ارزیابی تأثیر کارکردهای نهادهای میانجی در رفع ضعف های نظام ملی نوآوری ایران، فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری سال هشتم، شماره 1، صفحه 29-15.
هوشمندزاده مجتبی؛ زعفریان، رضا؛ محمدی الیاسی، قنبر (1395).شناسایی نقش سازمان های میانجی در نظام ملّی نوآوری ایران، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دوره 2، شماره 4،صفحه 187-202.
Abdel-Fattah, Yasser R.; Kashyout, Abdel-Hady B.; Sheta, Walaa M. (2013). Egypt`s Science and Technology Parks Outlook: A Focus on SRTACity (City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications). World Technopolis Review. pp.96-108
Alagić. (2005). ITALIAN EXPERIENCE ABOUT SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARKS. Paper presented at the QUALITY 2005, Fojnica.
Arnold, Erik; Kuhlman, Stefan. (2001). RCN in the Norwegian Research and Innovation System, Background Report No 12 in the Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry for Education, Research and Church Affairs. Also available at www.technopolis-group.com
Backhaus, J., (2010). Intermediaries as Innovating Actors in the Transition to A sustainable energy system. Central European Journal of Public Policy 4, 86–109.
Bellgardt, Gohlke, Haase, Parzonka, & Schicketanz. (2014). Triple helix and residential development in a science and technology park. Triple Helix. doi:10.1186/s40604-014-0010-1
Benassi, M., and A. Di Minin. (2009). Playing in between: Patent brokers in markets for technology. R&D Management 39, (1): 68-86.
Bessant, J., and H. Rush. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24, 97-114.
Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2008). Demand articulation in intermediary organisations: The case of orphan drugs in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(5), 644-671. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.03.001
Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2011). Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers? Research Policy, 40(2), 242-252.
Callon, M., (1994). Is science a public good? Science, Technology and Human Values 19, 395–424.
Carlsson, B., Stankiewicz, R., 1991. On the nature: function and composition of technological systems. J. Evol. Econ. 1, 93–118.
Cash, D.W., (2001). “In order to aid in diffusion useful and practical information” agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Science, Technology and Human Values 26, 431–453.
Colombo, G., Dell'Era, C. and Frattini, F. (2015), Contribution of innovation intermediaries to NPD process. R&D Manage, 45: 126-146. doi: 10.1111/radm.12056Davenport, S., Davies, J., Grimes, C., 1999. Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation 19, 31–40.
Dalziel. (2010). Why do innovation intermediaries exist? Paper presented at the Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology, Imperial College London Business School
Davenport, S., Davies, J., Grimes, C., (1999). Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation 19, 31–40.
Dheensa, S., Metcalfe, A., & Williams, R. A. (2013). Men's expriences of antenatal screening: A metasynthesis of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 121-133.
Gassmann, Daiber, & Enkel. (2011). The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes. R&D Management, 41(5).
Gredel, D., Kramer, M., & Bend, B. (2012). Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies. Technovation, 32(9), 536-549.
Guo, J., & Guo, B. (2013). How do innovation intermediaries facilitate knowledge spillovers within industrial clusters? A knowledge-processing perspective. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(sup2), 31-49. doi:10.1080/19761597.2013.819245
Grusei, A. (2014). Science and technology parks and university collaborations, Periodicals of Engineering and natural Sciences, 2(2).
Hallen, B.L., Katila, R., Rosenberger, J.D., (2014). How do social defenses work? A resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Academy of Management Journal 57, 1078–1101.
Hargadon, A. Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42. 718-749.
Hargadon, A.B., (1998). Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation.
California Management Review 40, 209–227.
Hodson, M. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 477-485, ISSN 0048-7333,
Howard Partners. (2007). The Role of Intermediaries in Support of Innovation. Report prepares for the Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia. April 2007
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
Inkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2010). Intermediaries in Regional Innovation Systems: High-Technology Enterprise Survey from Northern Finland. European Planning Studies, 18(2), 169-187.
Intarakumnerd, P., & Goto, A. (2018). Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI. Research Policy, 47(7), 1309-1320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.011
Johnson, W. (2008). Roles, Resources and Benefits of Intermediate Organizations Supporting Triple Helix Collaborative R&D: The Case of Precarn (Vol. 28).
Katzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., Sailer, K., (2013). Innovation intermediaries: a process view on
open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, 295–309.
Kautto, P., (2007). Industry–government interaction in the preparation of a new directive: Nokia, industry associations and EuP. Eur. Environ. 17 (2), 79–91.
Kelly, S.E., (2003). Public bioethics and publics: consensus, boundaries, and participation in biomedical science policy. Science, Technology and Human Values 28, 339–364.
Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370-1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2008). Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation, 28(6), 364-378. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.005
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural systems, 103(6), 390-400.
Kodama, T. (2008). The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university–industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan. Research Policy, 37(8), 1224-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.014
Kogut, B., Zander, U., (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Org. Sci. 3 (3), 383–397.
Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
Lin, H., Zeng, S., Liu, H., & Li, C. (2018). Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries’ effects on corporate innovation. Technovation. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.006
Lin H, Zeng S, Liu H, Li C (2020). Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries’ efects on corporate innovation. Technovation 94–95.
Littlewood, D. C., & Kiyumbu, W. L. (2018). “Hub” organisations in Kenya: What are they? What do they do? And what is their potential? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 276-285.
Lopeza, & Vanhaverbekea. (2010). connecting open and closed innovation markets: A typology of intermediaries. MPRA Paper. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27017/
Lynn, L.H., Reddy, N.M., Aram, J.D., 1996. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Res. Policy 25, 91–106.
Lyytinen, J.D.K., (2001). The role of intermediating institutions in the diffusion of electronic data interchange (EDI): How industry associations intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong. Inf. Soc. 17 (3), 195–210.
Major, C., & Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mehra, K. (2016). Role of Intermediary Organisations in Innovation Systems -A Case from India National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies.
Merkx, F., (2008). Organizing responsibilities for novelties in medical genetics. In: Dynamics and Productivity of Mutual Positioning in Hybrid Forums. University of Twente, Enschede.
Metcalfe, A. S. (2010). Examining the Trilateral Networks of the Triple Helix: Intermediating Organizations and Academy-Industry-Government Relations. Critical Sociology, 36(4), 503-519. doi:10.1177/0896920510365920
Meulman, W. F. (2017). Challenges for innovation intermediaries in technology transfer: forming controls and alliances Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Minguillo, Tijssen, & Thelwall. (2015). Do science parks promote research and technology A scientometric analysis of the UK. Scientometrics, 102, 701–725. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1435-z)
Mohammadhashemi, z, Zamani, f and Allahy, s. (2017). The functions of intermediary organizations in innovation process: The case of science and Technology Park, ASIALICS & IRAMOT, Tehran
Nakwa, & Zawdie. (2015). Structural holes, knowledge intermediaries and evolution of the triple helix system with reference to the hard disk drive industry in Thailand.
Nakwa, K., & Zawdie, G. (2012). The role of innovation intermediaries in promoting the triple helix system in MNC-dominated industries in Thailand: the case of hard disk drive and automotive sectors. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 11(3), 265-283.
Noviaristanti, S., Acur, N. & Mendibil, K. (2023). The different roles of innovation intermediaries to generate value. Manag Rev Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00364-2.
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: New York: Oxford University Press.
NOWAK, & WNUK. (2011). INTERMEDIARY ORGANISATIONS IN THE ISRAELI AND POLISH INNOVATION SYSTEMS. PROBLEMY EKSPLOATACJI. Nilsson, M., & Moodysson, J. (2011), “Policy coordination in systems of innovation: A structural-functional analysis of regional industry support in Sweden”, (No. 2011/9). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.
Polzin, F., von Flotow, P., & Klerkx, L. (2016). Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.001
Radnejad, A. B., Vredenburg, H., & Woiceshyn, J. (2017). Meta-organizing for open innovation under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry. Technovation, 66-67, 14-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.002
Ranga and Etzkowitz (2013), Triple helix system: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Ind high educ 27(4):237-262
Rochracher, H., (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of choice: the case of greenelectricity labelling. Environment and Planning A 41, 2014–2028.
Sandelowski, M., and Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
Shohert, S., Prevezer, M. 1996. UK biotechnology: institutional linkages, technology transfer and the role of intermediaries. R&D Management 26, 283-298.
Smits, R. (2002) `Innovation studies in the 21st century: questions from a user's perspective', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 69.
Stemler, Steve (2001).AN over view of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, Vol7 (17).
Steward, J., and S. Hyysalo. 2008. Intermediaries, users and social learning in technological innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 12, (3): 295-325.
Shohet, S., Prevezer, M., 1996. UK biotechnology: institutional linkages, technology transfer and
the role of intermediaries. R&D Management 26, 283–298.
Throne, s. (2009). The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: Can metasynthesis be the answer. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 569-575.
Tran, Y., Hsuan, J., Mahnke, V., (2011). How do innovation intermediaries add value? Insight from
new product development in fashion markets. R&D Management 41, 80–91.
Van der Meulen, B., Rip, A., 1998. Mediation in the Dutch science system. Res. Policy 27, 757–769.
Van lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., Van waveren, B., (2003). Role of systematic intermediaries in transition process. International journal of innovation management 7, 247-279.
Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004
Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004
Watkins, D., Horley, G. (1986). Transferring technology from large to small firms: the role of intermediaries. In: Webb, T., Quince, T., Watkins, D. (Eds.), Small Business Research. Gower, Aldershot, pp. 215-251.
Wigand, R.T., Frankwick, G.L., (1989). Inter–organizational communication and technology transfer:
industry–government–university linkages. International Journal of Technology Management
4, 63–76.
Winch, G. M., and R. Courtney. (2007). The organization of innovation brokers: An international review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, (6): 747-63
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021
Yusuf, S. (2008). Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses. Research Policy, 37(8), 1167-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.011
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 88-109. doi:10.1002/smj.806
