Journal of Improvement Management

Journal of Improvement Management

Designing an Optimal Outsourcing Model for Classified Defense Industrial Research Projects: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Mathematical Programming Approach

Document Type : Research Article (Original Article)

Authors
Shahram Aliyari 1
Seyyed Ziauddin Ghazizadeh Fard 1
Mobin Mokhtari 2
1 Associate Prof of Imam Hussein University, Tehran , Iran
2 Faculty of Industrial Engineering - Imam Hussein (AS) Comprehensive University - Tehran - Iran
10.22034/jmi.2025.515420.3200
Abstract
This study presents an advanced optimization model for the secure outsourcing of classified defense industrial research projects, with a particular focus on overcoming barriers to leveraging external organizational capacities. The core objective is to propose a rigorous solution that maximizes the effective use of external resources while safeguarding sensitive information. Information classification is recognized as a critical determinant of data security and confidentiality. Nevertheless, stringent classification protocols may impede information flow, reduce project efficiency, and complicate collaboration with scientific and industrial experts.To address these challenges, the research adopts a three-tiered hybrid methodology: (1) the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for comprehensive decision analysis, (2) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for systematically identifying and managing confidentiality risks, and (3) mathematical allocation modeling to ensure secure and efficient outsourcing. The findings demonstrate marked improvements in both the preservation of security and the enhancement of operational efficiency. Among seven primary confidentiality criteria in defense projects, "macro-level security" (weight: 0.33) and "critical elements" (weight: 0.19) emerged as the highest priorities. The principal contribution of this work is the development of a multi-objective allocation model that rigorously balances outsourcing costs with confidentiality risks, thereby enabling optimized use of external capacities without compromising security. This framework not only ensures the protection of sensitive information but also promotes broader collaboration with national industrial and academic experts, advancing the interests of national defense. Ultimately, the proposed model provides policymakers with a robust, practical decision-making tool for secure outsourcing that aligns operational efficiency with stringent security imperatives.
Keywords
Secure outsourcing
Confidentiality risk management
Multi-criteria decision-making
Resource allocation optimization
Defense industrial research
Subjects

  1. سیدضیاءالدین قاضی زاده فرد، محمدسعید اتابکی، "معرفی الگوی برون‌سپاری در سازمان های نظامی"، فصلنامه راهبرد دفاعی 10، شماره 39 (1391): 153. magiran.com/p1080814

    سعید هداوند و امیر نجفی, "عامل‌های کلیدی اثرگذار در همکاری‌های دانشگاه‌ها و صنایع دفاعی کشور," رهیافت, 30 4 (1399): 67-82, doi: 10.22034/rahyaft.2021.10407.1129

    جواد وزیری , سید سپهر قاضی نوری , محمدامین قانعی راد و حمیدرضا فرتوک زاده, "فهم سه وجهی از گذار در صنعت دفاعی ایران؛با تأکید بر صنعت موشکی," بهبود مدیریت, 9 2 (1394): 31-54,

    علی اصغر توفیق , سیدضیاءالدین قاضی‌زاده فرد و حسن رجبی مسرور, "مقاله پژوهشی: شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی محرک‌ها و عوامل مؤثر در تعیین قابلیت برون‌سپاری طرح‌های تحقیق و توسعه دفاعی," راهبرد دفاعی, 13 3 (1394): 95-

    حسین دهقانی پوده , محسن چشم براه , حسن ترابی , محمد حسین کریمی گوارشکی و رضا حسنوی, "تعیین و اولویت ‏بندی شاخص‏های مؤثر بر برونسپاری پروژه‏های تحقیق و توسعه محصولات با سامانه های پیچیده (مورد مطالعه: سازمان صنایع هوایی )," مدیریت توسعه فناوری, 5 3 (1396): 139-168, doi: 10.22104/jtdm.2018.2699.1910

    فرزانه حاجی حسنی, "شناسایی مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های تاثیرگذار بر شبکه تحقیقات دفاعی به منظور برون‌سپاری پروژه‌های تحقیق و توسعه آینده," آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی, 4 14 (1398): 87-113, doi: 10.22034/dfsr.2019.37987

    مهدی مرادی و حسین جبل عاملیان, "ارائه الگوی راهبردی توسعه همکاری‌های پژو هشی صنایع دفاعی و دانشگاه‌ها در افق 1414," مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی, 8 30 (1403): 7-28,

    محمد زهرایی، مهدی و نورنگ، احمد و امامیان، سهیل"ارائه مدل مناسب برای انتخاب سبد پروژه های تحقیقات دفاعی با تاکید بر ریسک، دوازدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت پروژه، تهران،(1395) https://civilica.com/doc/575192.

    Chesbrough, Henry William. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, 2003.

    Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. Design rules: The power of modularity. MIT Press. (2000).

    DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001

    Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., & Rivard, SAssessing the risk of IT outsourcing. Information Systems Frontiers. (2016). 18(6), 1109–1128. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9582-1

    Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. G.. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, (1994) 35(4), 43–55:      https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/strategic-outsourcing/

    Suorsa, Olli Pekka, and Brendon J. Cannon. "Ensuring security of supply: pragmatic defence autarky and Finland’s defence industry." Defence Studies (2025): 1-21.

    Setiawan, Andi, Yusuf Ali, and Makmur Supriyatno. "Optimization of Alutsista Procurement Management as a Means of State Defense to Support the Role of The Indonesian’s Army in Implementing Duties." International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences 3, no. 4 (2024).

    Batka, Caroline. "Outsourcing national defense: why and how private contractors are providing public services: by Thomas C. Bruneau, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2023, $45.00, ISBN: 978-1-955055-95-6." (2023): 561-565.

    Kordova, Sigal, and Shimon Fridkin. "Risk management for defense SoS in a complex, dynamic environment." Sustainability 13, no. 4 (2021): 1789.

    Efremov, Andrey Aleksandrovich, Sergei Sergeevich Golubev, and Vladimir Dmitriyevich Sekerin. "Principles of Project Management During the Design and Implementation of the Defense Industry Development Programs." REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E TECNOLOGIAS 11, no. 4 (2021): 424-440

    Golubev, S. S., A. G. Shcherbakov, T. V. Shutova, and Yu V. Daneykin. "Project management of the formation and implementation of state programs for the Russian defence industrial complex development." In International Scientific and Practical Conference “Russia 2020-a new reality: economy and society”(ISPCR 2020), pp. 110-117. Atlantis Press, 2021.

    Mahoney, Charles W. "United States defence contractors and the future of military operations." Defense & Security Analysis 36, no. 2 (2020): 180-200.

    Yurievna, Konshunova Anna, and Anna Konshunova. "Types of projects. Classification of projects and their types. Technical projects. Organizational projects. Project classification criteria."

    Yu, Dae Beom, and Jay In Oh. "Influencing Factors on Outsourcing Success in the Defense Sector." Information Systems Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 79-103.

    Dao, Bich Nga. "Project categorization systems and their role for project portfolio management." Online: http://www. projektakademien. se/pa/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IPM_thesis_Nga-Dao. pdf (Last view: 27.01. 2017) (2011).

    . Desticioglu Tasdemir, Beste, and Merve Asilogullari Ayan. "Sustainable supplier selection in the defense industry with multi-criteria decision-making methods." In International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems, pp. 95-106. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023.

    Department of Defense MANUAL “ Instructions for Developing Security Classification Guides “  April 2, 2013, Incorporating Change 2, Effective September 15, 2020 , NUMBER 5200.45

    1. L. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process McGraw-Hill,” New York, vol. 324, 1980
    2. M. Meade and J. Sarkis, “Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 241–261, 1999.
    3. Xia and W. Cheng, “Sustainable development strategy of rural built-up landscapes in Northeast China based on ANP approach,” Energy Procedia, vol. 157, pp. 844–850, 2019.
    4. L. Saaty, “Analytic Hierarchy Process BT - Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science,” S. I. Gass and M. C. Fu, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013, pp. 52–64

    Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 1195-

    Chang, C.-T., 2011. Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215, 439–445

  • Receive Date 26 April 2025
  • Revise Date 10 August 2025
  • Accept Date 21 August 2025